The latest episode of the Security Clearance Careers podcast tackles a common theme in the security clearance process: trying to impress your background investigator. Lindy Kyzer and Sean Bigley discuss why many applicants mistakenly treat their background investigation as an extension of the job interview, even listing high-profile individuals as references. But dazzling the investigator with your connections and best stories isn’t the focus of the investigation.
For those new to the process, this episode breaks down the differences between a background investigation and a job interview, and why it’s crucial to stay honest and straightforward.
Kyzer and Bigley dive into the common mistakes applicants make when interacting with background investigators. One key takeaway is that over-communicating or trying to justify your entire career trajectory can create unnecessary complications. Instead of adding value, it can lead investigators to spend more time digging into irrelevant details, ultimately slowing down the process.
The two highlight the difference between the hiring process and the security clearance process. Many applicants don’t realize that once they’ve entered the clearance phase, they’ve already passed the job application hurdle. Trying to continue impressing decision-makers during the investigation stage is not only unnecessary but can also backfire. The focus should be on providing accurate and relevant information related to security and trustworthiness, rather than trying to stand out.
Don’t miss out on these expert insights—listen to the full episode now to ensure your clearance process goes as smoothly as possible!
